Above are clear photos of the final publication. Using different stock for the front cover ensured that it was distinguished from the content. The gloss stock is thicker, keeping the content from damage efficiently. Due to the nature of the stock, the blacks on the image are brought out, and really do pop. Alongside the clear, large title text, this draws a reader in and attracts their attention. Negatives of using this stock for the cover is that it gathers dirt and fingerprints easily. It was also more strenuous to fold as accurately as possible because of the finish. With excessive use, the spine of the fold may also crack, however during production the spine remained intact without much wear and tear, meaning the user would have to simply treat the publication with care when using it.
The most appropriate binding method was staple binding. Although it could be said that a saddle stitch would be more durable, this would also increase production time and cost. Staple binding is simple and gets the job done suitably. After researching existing publications it was apparent that it is a popular method of binding, which is not distracting to the content or cover. When the audience is using it, they will not be looking at the binding, and more focused on the content within. It is a method that makes less room for human error and reduces the risk of something going very wrong with the binding, however stapling must be accurate to ensure it is neat and functional.
As for the content, it is printed on Antalis Digigreen Silk 115GSM stock. A thinner, yet glossy stock which amplifies the dark tones of the photography and remains looking professional and crisp. This stock does not seem to accumulate dirt or fingerprints easily as it is dryer and less 'tacky' than the glossier finish.
No comments:
Post a Comment